Amazon’s lesson for a plenary
Pilgrims travel in boats as they accompany the statue of Our Lady of Nazareth during an annual river procession and pilgrimage along the Apeu River to a chapel in Macapazinho, Brazil, 3 August 2014. PHOTO: CNS/Ney Marcondes, Reuters
If SportsBet was taking wagers on the outcome of the Synod of Bishops for the Pan-Amazon region, I think plenty of people would have lost money last week.
That the Holy Father’s post-synodal apostolic exhortation, Querida Amazonia, (Beloved Amazon) was going to authorise the ordination of married men to the priesthood for the Amazon region seemed a fait accompli.
After all, there were legitimate reasons to request a dispensation for clerical celibacy in the Amazon region: the vastness of area concerned and the isolation of certain peoples within the region has seen many go months and even years without access to the sacraments.
Additionally, at the conclusion of the Synod, more than three-quarters of the Synod Fathers voted in favour of ordaining married men, and an even greater number voted in favour of women deacons.
If Pope Francis was really the progressive warrior he is portrayed to be, the evident need for more priests in the region and the overwhelming approval of married priests and women deacons at the Synod was his permission structure to make the change.
He didn’t.
Instead, he called for what the Church has always called for in times of need: prayer and self-sacrifice for the sake of the Gospel.
In the Apostolic Exhortation, Pope Francis wrote that if we are truly convinced that no Christian community can be built up if it does not hinge on the celebration of the Eucharist, then every effort should be made to ensure the Amazonian peoples are not deprived of that great gift.
“Every effort should be made,” he wrote. He asked for effort, not simplistic solutions articulated from the comfortable distance of the western world. The Holy Father wasn’t taking the easy way out and won’t let the faithful take the easy way out either.
Pope Francis wrote that the uneven pastoral presence over the vast expanse of the Amazon region meant “a specific and courageous response is required of the Church”. The Holy Father not only called for an increase in prayer for vocations to the priesthood, but also for bishops “to be more generous in encouraging those who display a missionary vocation to opt for the Amazon region”.
In saying this, Pope Francis noted that in some countries in the Amazon basin, more missionaries go to Europe or the US than remain to assist in their own region. The problem isn’t a lack of priests, it seems, but a lack of those willing to be missionaries in the Amazon.
A good number of people were disappointed with the Pope’s decision on celibacy, including the president of the Central Committee of German Catholics, who lambasted the Pope for not having “the courage to implement real reforms regarding the issues of the ordination of married men and the liturgical competences of women”.
He was joined by a German Catholic women’s group, purporting to represent 450,000 women, that claimed the result was “a devastating result for any woman who had hoped for equal rights within the Catholic Church”.
One Catholic politician in the United States predicted that some women would end up leaving the Church and “ultimately abandoning Christ and their own salvation” as a result of this disappointment. It doesn’t seem like any of these were too concerned about the Amazon region, and instead were hoping that the Amazon Synod would be a stalking horse for sweeping changes to Church discipline across the world.
Pope Francis reportedly addressed the issue in the presence of some US Bishops, telling them that he was being criticised for not listening to the Spirit, presuming of course that the Spirit agreed with the critics and not with current Church discipline, or with the Pope for that matter.
Pope Francis greets people during the Synod of Bishops for the Amazon at the Vatican. Photo: CNS/Vatican Media
We need to be careful that the same thing does not happen with our own Plenary Council.
The idea that “everything will be on the table” at the Council has been largely unchallenged, and so there is an expectation coming from many well-meaning people that big changes will happen.
This is similar to the many, including myself, who expected the outcome of the Amazon Synod would be the authorising of married clergy in that region.
And just as happened with the Amazon Synod, there are others who are watching the Plenary Council, hoping that even small changes made to Church discipline will lead to greater and more universal ones in the future.
Querida Amazonia is our strongest indication that this is unlikely to happen because changes proposed by the Plenary Council ultimately need the approval of the Holy See.
While the needs of the Amazon region and the Church in Australia seem so different, my prediction is that the Council will tell us the solution appears to be quite similar, and that instead of proposing grand changes, the Council will once again call us back to basics of prayer and service as the primary way to address the present needs of the Church.
This article was first published in the Catholic Weekly
Can’t Catholics who want to be members of a Catholic church that allows married priests transfer to a non-Latin Catholic church like one of the Greek/Ukrainian/Romanian etc Catholic Orthodox Churches? Where they won’t be bamboozled by ontological arguments that a Catholic priest must be male & celibate.
Can someone please tell me why Monica Doumit gets such a good run in Catholic Voice? We don’t need any more of her conservative Sydney perspective in Canberra-Goulburn.
John,
I totally agree with your view. Like many Catholics concerned with the decline in active membership of Catholics in the Church, I thought that Pope Francis would agree with the obvious need for ordained ministers, married men of good faith,to minister to the needs of the faithful, not just in the remote Amazon, but also in Australia where aging priests are spread so thinly and have to cover such distances each Sunday to service ever expanding Parishes,as they continue to close and are amalgamated into mega parishes.
I suspect that conservative forces in the Vatican bureaucracy have won the day yet again.
I might add that I have little hope that the upcoming Plenary Council will be little more than a talk fest .Nothing will change. Its is an extravagant waste of scarce resources that the Church really needs to keep afloat financially, as the numbers in the pews decline.
It really hurts me to write this.
This is so sad to hear. Looks as though Plenary council will be waste of time and no advancement only more decay.
I am not sure why people who have been in the Church a long time seem to suggest that, unless the Church changes along lines they hope for, they will leave. Has their fidelity to the Church thus far been conditional on the Church changing, or have they come to these views after long theological reflection and heartfelt prayer. If after the latter course, how is it that their process of discernment yields a different result to that of Pope Francis? Is the opinion of the Holy Spirit divided on this matter? But in any case, if debate is to be encouraged, shouldn’t that debate allow opinions supportive of the Pope. How will greater understanding of theological and social questions be achievable among us if an open exchange of ideas is discouraged?
Paul,
I have been in the Church since my Baptism about 71 years ago.I have seen great changes during my lifetime. Remember the Mass in Latin. Remember the celebrant facing the altar .We now have Married Deacons and Acolytes serving the Church, each in their own way. I was in high school when Vatican II was in progress.Years later the changes I just described, started but have now ground to a halt.Why? Why are attendance at Sunday Mass declining?Is it because people are better educated and don’t accept the Good News of Salvation as being relevant to their lives? Is it because of the terrible scandals that have been revealed ? Pope John XIII saw a need for ‘updating’ the Church in the 1960’s. I suspect he and Francis see the light of the Spirit.I hope we can too in the upcoming Plenary Council.